Auto-capture tool & process updates from Slack in a centralized changelogMulti-product solution
Tables, Zaps, Canvas
Smart incident postmortem reviews
Turn every incident into faster learning, and save your DevOps team time, with AI-powered postmortem analysis and trend tracking
Click and drag to move around the canvas and pinch to zoom.
Overview
Engineering teams often struggle with lengthy, multi-round incident retrospective reviews that delay learning and improvement. Staff engineers get bogged down reviewing a high volume of retrospectives, taking time away from critical engineering work. This template offers a solution by automating the initial review process, helping teams identify gaps faster and reducing the workload on staff engineers.
This template leverages the power of AI to revolutionize how your engineering team handles incident retrospectives. By automating the initial review process, it helps teams quickly identify gaps and improve the quality of their retrospectives before a staff engineer needs to step in. This not only accelerates learning from incidents but also frees up valuable time for your senior engineers to focus on high-impact work.
Why build an automated incident retrospective review system?
- Accelerate the learning process from incidents, preventing repeat mistakes.
- Reduce the workload on staff engineers, allowing them to focus on high-value engineering tasks.
- Improve the overall quality and consistency of retrospectives across your engineering team.
What key features come with this template?
- AI-powered analysis — The system uses advanced AI to review retrospectives, identifying potential gaps and areas for improvement automatically.
- Customizable feedback — Tailor the feedback criteria to align with your organization's specific retrospective standards and best practices.
- Integration with existing tools — Seamlessly connect with your current project management and communication platforms for a smooth workflow.
Who should use this template
An automated incident retrospective review system is perfect for:
- Engineering managers → Improve the quality and efficiency of your team's incident review process while reducing the burden on staff engineers.
- Staff engineers → Spend less time on manual retrospective reviews and more time on high-impact engineering work.
- DevOps teams → Accelerate learning from incidents and implement operational improvements more quickly.
- Quality assurance specialists → Ensure consistency and thoroughness in incident retrospectives across the organization.
How does this template work?
This template automates incident postmortem review using AI analysis and team notifications. Here's the complete workflow:
1. Incident capture
- Automatic: Incidents flow in from Incident.io via webhook when marked "closed" with a postmortem document
- Manual: Team members can submit retrospective docs through the submission form
- Polling: Hourly checks for new closed incidents via the Incident.io API
2. AI-powered review
- When a new retrospective is added to the incident feedback log, AI analyzes the document content
- Reviews are evaluated against engineering best practices (customer impact, root cause analysis, action items)
- Generates detailed feedback with specific suggestions for improvement
3. Smart notification routing
- If a reviewer email is provided → sends feedback via direct Slack message
- Otherwise → posts review to your designated team Slack channel
- Includes links to the original document for easy access
4. Weekly insights digest
- Automatically compiles weekly retrospective analytics every hour
- Creates TLDR summaries and week-over-week progress comparisons
- Posts digest to Slack with detailed breakdowns in thread
This streamlines the entire incident learning process, from automatic capture to actionable feedback, helping engineering teams improve faster while reducing manual review overhead.
Frequently asked questions
How accurate is the AI-powered analysis?
The AI analysis is highly accurate and constantly improving. However, it's designed to complement, not replace, human expertise. The bot helps catch common issues and inconsistencies, but a final human review is still recommended for critical incidents.
Can we customize the review criteria?
Absolutely. The template allows you to set and adjust the criteria the AI uses to review retrospectives. This ensures the bot aligns with your organization's specific standards and best practices.
Will this completely eliminate the need for staff engineer reviews?
While the RetroReviewBot significantly reduces the time staff engineers spend on reviews, it doesn't eliminate the need entirely. Instead, it allows staff engineers to focus their expertise on more complex aspects of retrospectives and high-level improvements.
How does this template integrate with our existing tools?
The RetroReviewBot template is designed to work seamlessly with popular project management and communication tools. Through Zapier's extensive integration capabilities, you can connect it with platforms like Jira, Slack, Microsoft Teams, and many others to fit into your existing workflow.
